Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video106.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hartig results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 51.629 hits. Analysis detected 313.315 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,144 of 28,364 speakers). This Hartig is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Hartig
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 106.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
35.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos106.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 45.4%45.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 45.4%45.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.2%28.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos