Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Gonzalez results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 1,202 hits. Analysis detected 10,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (934 of 6,621 authors). This Mike Gonzalez is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Mike Gonzalez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠86%Mike Gonzalez (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,360
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.9% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 27.6%27.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 21.0%21.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.9%14.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.6%9.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.0%17.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 9.7%9.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 25.2%25.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 25.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 21.0%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos