Speaker summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos400.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Jones results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 122.851 hits. Analysis detected 707.682 faulty-reasoning hits from 400.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (25,853 of 28,364 speakers). This Hannah Jones is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
Hannah Jones
Speaker details
Total words: 400.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.9% percentile
8.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos400.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Composition/Division: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos