Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos70.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Dugan results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 24.116 hits. Analysis detected 106.15 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,956 of 28,364 speakers). This Hannah Dugan is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Hannah Dugan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 70.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
18.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos70.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 42.9%42.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.3%13.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 42.9%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos