Speaker summary
⁠34%4 analyzed articles/videos253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Goose results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 324 faulty-reasoning hits from 253 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 13% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,244 of 28,364 speakers). This Goose is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Goose
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 253
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.1% percentile
13.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos253 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.1%25.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos