Speaker summary
66%3 analyzed articles/videos125.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Times results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 353.887 faulty-reasoning hits from 125.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,060 of 28,364 speakers). This Global Times is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Global Times
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
20.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos125.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 48.5%48.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.7%21.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 16.1%16.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.7%15.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate