Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CHAN HO-HIM AP business writer results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 211 hits . Analysis detected 1,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,682 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,693 of 6,368 authors). This CHAN HO-HIM AP business writer is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. CHAN HO-HIM AP business writer
Author details
Total words: 2,682
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst