Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video63.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Detroit results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 56 faulty-reasoning hits from 63.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (21,126 of 37,438 speakers). This Global Detroit is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Global Detroit
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠44%Global Detroit (selected)26%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 63.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
25.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos63.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 25.9%25.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos