Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video128.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gina Davis results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 82.4% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 272.172 faulty-reasoning hits from 128.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,264 of 28,364 speakers). This Gina Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Gina Davis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 128.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.3% percentile
42.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos128.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 82.3%82.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 82.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos