Speaker summary
⁠49%3 analyzed articles/videos129.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gillian Turner results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 82.2% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 666.379 faulty-reasoning hits from 129.333 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 37.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,443 of 28,364 speakers). This Gillian Turner is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Gillian Turner
Speaker details
Total words: 129.333
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
37.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos129.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 82.2%82.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 55.2%55.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 20.1%20.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 82.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 55.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos