Author summary
23%2 analyzed articles/videos1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manodeep Mukherjee results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 437 hits. Analysis detected 3,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,368 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,283 of 6,357 authors). This Manodeep Mukherjee is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Manodeep Mukherjee
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
17%Manodeep Mukherjee (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,368
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510016.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate