Publication summary
17% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attack of the Fanboy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 4,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,900 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 27% (298 of 408 publications). This Attack of the Fanboy is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,900
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst