Author summary
ā 14% 1 analyzed article/video 633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Santosh Kumari results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 204 hits . Analysis detected 1,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 39% (3,874 of 6,315 authors). This Santosh Kumari is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Santosh Kumari
Author details
Total words: 2,532
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Tu Quoque: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst