Speaker summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Arison results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Genetic Fallacy, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 199 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,374 of 28,364 speakers). This George Arison is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
George Arison
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.6% percentile
16.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.6%15.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos