Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garrett Haake results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 95 faulty-reasoning hits from 152 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,659 of 28,364 speakers). This Garrett Haake is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Garrett Haake
Speaker details
Total words: 152
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
19.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos152 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos