Speaker summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gadi Eisenkot results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 66% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,383 of 28,364 speakers). This Gadi Eisenkot is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Gadi Eisenkot
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠78%Gadi Eisenkot (selected)66%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
66.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 66.0%66.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 26.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos