Speaker summary
⁠65%3 analyzed articles/videos293.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francesca Albanese results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 45% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 707.198 faulty-reasoning hits from 293.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,339 of 28,364 speakers). This Francesca Albanese is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Francesca Albanese
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠18%Francesca Albanese (selected)13%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 293.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510017.7% percentile
12.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos293.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.6%23.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos