Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Caspar results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,163 of 28,364 speakers). This Fort Caspar is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Fort Caspar
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos