Speaker summary
⁠34%4 analyzed articles/videos192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Finance Ministry results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 458 faulty-reasoning hits from 192 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,137 of 28,364 speakers). This Finance Ministry is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Finance Ministry
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
16.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos192 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos