Speaker summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fedorov results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Ad Hominem, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 202 faulty-reasoning hits from 75 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,035 of 28,364 speakers). This Fedorov is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Fedorov
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 75
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
26.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos75 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 34.7%34.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos