Speaker summary
⁠71%4 analyzed articles/videos71.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Emergency Management Agency results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 287.782 faulty-reasoning hits from 71.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,434 of 28,364 speakers). This Federal Emergency Management Agency is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Speaker details
Total words: 71.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
37.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos71.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 62.7%62.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.5%27.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 62.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos