KQED61%

After Pacifica Pier Damage, Bay Area Leaders Urge Trump to Restore Aid 21%

By Ezra David Romero0%

6/16/2026, 4:00:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 1,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 829 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.2% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,326 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the article peer group.

Bay Area officials are calling on the Trump administration to provide immediate aid for Pacifica’s seawall after its pier and a beloved cafe cracked this month. 
The city last week decided to tear down the Chit Chat Cafe, situated at the end of the Pacific Municipal Pier, so that it wouldn’t crumble into the sea. 
The pier remains indefinitely closed. 
Congressman Sam Liccardo, whose district includes Pacifica, demanded that the Trump administration reinstate the $50 million it revoked last year, so the city can rebuild the seawall. 
He is also asking for immediate financial aid to repair parts of the pier and to develop solutions for nearby areas facing significant coastal erosion. 
“We need to save this pier,” Liccardo said in front of the dilapidated structure. 
“We need to do all that we can to protect Pacifica and our coast side.” 
“It turns out the climate doesn’t care whether or not we believe in climate change,” he continued. 
“If we do not act, the ocean will always win the battle over coastal erosion.” 
For Gordon Prescott, who attended the Chit Chat Cafe’s opening ceremony in 1973, its closure is devastating. 
“We were two of the kids waiting in line when they cut the ribbon,” Prescott said. 
“It’s kind of like losing an old friend.” 
In a June 12 letter to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Liccardo said that, although the agency has short-listed the project under the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program, the city has not been awarded funding because FEMA halted the program. 
But after a federal judge ordered the agency to make the funding available, FEMA reopened applications for the resilience grant program in March. 
Liccardo wrote that the project is undergoing environmental and historical preservation reviews, and that FEMA could then process the application for the award. 
He also asked the administration for an extension on a project to strengthen a nearby eroding bluff, where waves and erosion had forced the city to tear down three apartment buildings. 
“It’s unfortunate that Pacifica has lost valuable time on a project that would prevent exactly the damage that occurred at the pier last week,” Liccardo wrote. 
He also announced new bipartisan legislation, the “Ounce of Prevention” Act, a bill that Liccardo said would allow state and local governments to use Community Development Block Grants for disaster preparedness  not just after a catastrophe. 
The Pacifica City Council last week unanimously voted to declare a local state of emergency around the pier. 
It is also seeking a state of emergency from the governor and help from the state. 
Currently, the city is working to stabilize the pier by adding 150 boulders at the pier’s seawall connection. 
After that work is finished, City Manager Sean Charpentier said Pacifica will consider two options: bracing the pier from below with a pylon or removing it from the seawall to stabilize the first section of the structure. 
“Construction in the coastal zone is very complicated, and we don’t have a time frame for when that would begin right now,” Charpentier said. 
Charpentier said that even before the most recent damages, the pier alone would cost around $21 million to fix. 
The sea wall regularly fails throughout the year, allowing waves to crash over the structure and flood Beach Boulevard. 
The city’s sea wall project, the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project, would cost more than $80 million. 
Pacifica Mayor Christine Boles said she hopes the administration reinstates funding so the city can move forward with a plan to rebuild the seawall. 
She fears that as seas continue to rise, Pacifica’s coastal issues will only worsen. 
“We in Pacifica are the canary in the coal mine for the increasing effects of a warming ocean,” Boles said. 
“Sea level rise, coastal erosion, and flooding are already here.” 
Boles said the city is beginning to define a community vision for the changing coastline and potential solutions. 
It will likely hold community listening sessions this fall. 
But still, she noted, the city needs outside help. 
“Individual cities cannot address these massive global climate threats on our own,” Boles said. 
“The state and federal government need to bring significantly higher amounts of financial support.” 
Meanwhile, locals are still reeling from the Chit Chat Cafe’s teardown. 
“My husband Brandon and I are still in shock,” said Ginger Davis, one of the cafe’s owners. 
“We all knew that the pier had seen better days, but none of us expected it to end like this.” 
The community has raised more than $30,000 for the couple through a GoFundMe page. 
Pacifica resident Lilia Bae Cadotte spent many early mornings fishing off the pier. 
She said she would like the city to reopen it as soon as possible. 
“The Pacifica Pier is not just a pier,” Cadotte said. 
“She’s a home. 
She’s the gate that unlocks many doors for many people  and it is a source that provides us food.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.8%Ezra David Romero: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias4.8%This article: 4.3%Ezra David Romero: 1.8%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias4.3%This article: 1.7%Ezra David Romero: 3.1%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic1.7%This article: 2.4%Ezra David Romero: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 5.5%Ezra David Romero: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 2.8%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Ezra David Romero: 7.5%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect13.6%This article: 9.7%Ezra David Romero: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion9.7%This article: 1.7%Ezra David Romero: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias1.7%This article: 3.7%Ezra David Romero: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.7%This article: 4.6%Ezra David Romero: 0.8%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias4.6%This article: 6.5%Ezra David Romero: 4.4%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 15.0%Ezra David Romero: 8.5%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias15.0%This article: 3.3%Ezra David Romero: 0.1%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Ezra David Romero: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.7%This article: 2.4%Ezra David Romero: 0.5%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Ezra David Romero: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Ezra David Romero: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.9%Ezra David Romero: 3.6%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority4.9%This article: 13.5%Ezra David Romero: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma13.5%This article: 3.5%Ezra David Romero: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope3.5%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.9%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.6%Ezra David Romero: 6.2%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion16.6%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 18.1%Ezra David Romero: 1.3%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.1%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.3%Ezra David Romero: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof6.3%This article: 2.1%Ezra David Romero: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.1%This article: 1.7%Ezra David Romero: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division1.7%This article: 8.1%Ezra David Romero: 1.1%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal8.1%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.5%Ezra David Romero: 1.9%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.5%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.4%Ezra David Romero: 1.2%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice1.4%This article: 8.7%Ezra David Romero: 3.1%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination8.7%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 1.7%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ezra David Romero: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Ezra David Romero: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.5%

829 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers78%attributed speech183writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 27 words • 0.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 14 words • 100.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 15 words • 100.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 15 words • 100.0% coverageGordon Prescott • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGordon Prescott • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGordon Prescott • 8 words • 0.0% coverageFederal Emergency Management Agency • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 31 words • 0.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSam Liccardo • 37 words • 100.0% coveragePacifica City Council • 18 words • 0.0% coveragePacifica City Council • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSean Charpentier • 37 words • 0.0% coverageSean Charpentier • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSean Charpentier • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Boles • 24 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Boles • 14 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Boles • 20 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Boles • 10 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Boles • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Boles • 9 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Boles • 14 words • 100.0% coverageChristine Boles • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageGinger Davis • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGinger Davis • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLilia Bae Cadotte • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLilia Bae Cadotte • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLilia Bae Cadotte • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLilia Bae Cadotte • 3 words • 0.0% coverageLilia Bae Cadotte • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sam Liccardo

90%flagged-word coverage
230 attributed words36% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Indoctrination+19.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sam Liccardo: 19.1%19.1%Attempt to Sell a Product +16.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sam Liccardo: 16.1%16.1%Biased Writer Voice-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Sam Liccardo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.