Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video286.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Liccardo results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 59.189 hits. Analysis detected 605.471 faulty-reasoning hits from 286.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,504 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Liccardo is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Sam Liccardo
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠11%Sam Liccardo (selected)10%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 286.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.1% percentile
9.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos286.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.4%14.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.1%14.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos