Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sam Liccardo results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 2,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Sam Liccardo is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sam Liccardo
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Sam Liccardo (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,316
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos