Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fabiola Mendieta-Cuapio results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 491.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 126 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,973 of 28,364 speakers). This Fabiola Mendieta-Cuapio is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Fabiola Mendieta-Cuapio
Speaker details
Total words: 126
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
35.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos126 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 54.8%54.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.7%13.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 54.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos