Speaker summary
⁠47%4 analyzed articles/videos92.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Office of Immigration Review results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 55.6% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 152 faulty-reasoning hits from 92.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,525 of 28,364 speakers). This Executive Office of Immigration Review is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Executive Office of Immigration Review
Speaker details
Total words: 92.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
17.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos92.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 55.6%55.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.1%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos