KUOW - Hundreds of children ordered to appear at new 'mega' immigration hearings in Seattle 14%

7/9/2026, 3:00:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,026 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.6% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,858 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the article peer group.

Hundreds of children ordered to appear at new 'mega' immigration hearings in Seattle 
People, including minors, wait outside an immigration courtroom Thursday, July 9, at the Henry M. 
Jackson Federal Building in Seattle. 
The courtroom this week began so-called "mega master" hearings that speed up immigration hearings for youth pursuing legal status in the U.S. 
KUOW Photo / Gustavo Sagrero Álvarez 
A 14-year-old girl was sitting alone in the courthouse pews Tuesday in one of Seattle’s immigration courtrooms at the Henry M. 
Jackson Federal Building. 
A concerned lawyer walked by her occasionally and offered gestures of encouragement. 
She smiled. 
In her lap was a thick folder full of legal documents, a pen, and a phone. 
At the front of the courtroom, a young man who just turned 18 was told by presiding judge Theresa Scala that he’s running out of time to submit his immigration documents. 
Earlier that day outside the packed courtroom, a teenage girl sat in a stuffy waiting room. 
There was no space for her inside while her brother had his hearing. 
Seattle’s immigration court is packed with kids this week. 
Minors used to only have their hearings on Fridays, attorneys say  but starting Tuesday, the federal government embarked on what it says is a new way to process a backlog of cases. 
All these cases used to take months or years to process. 
Now they’re being moved up, sped up, and packed in on more days  in what are called “mega master” hearings. 
These expanded hearings have already been taking place for adults over the past weeks and have now started for children. 
A flag flies above the Henry M. 
Jackson Federal Building in Seattle. 
It’s common for children or any immigrants who are trying to get legal status in the U.S to face these initial court hearings, or what’s called master calendar hearings alone. 
But some of the children at Tuesday's mega master hearing arrived with parents, guardians, and attorneys. 
Federal officials say these hearings are a way to quickly remove cases from the system that have no merit and aid efforts to cut back on court backlogs. 
RELATED : Inside the coordinated strategy to radically reshape U.S. immigration 
“Unnecessary delay hurts both aliens with meritorious claims and the American public who wish to see aliens with non-meritorious claims removed as quickly as possible,” wrote a spokesperson from the Executive Office of Immigration Review in a statement to press. 
In that same statement, a spokesperson for the U.S. 
Department of Justice wrote, “The Justice Department is restoring integrity to our immigration system by hearing cases fairly, expeditiously, and uniformly, in accordance with the law.” 
Pilar Martinez, an attorney with the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, was part of a group of legal observers and volunteer attorneys who descended upon the hallways of Seattle’s immigration court to monitor the accelerated and condensed proceedings and their impact on youth pursuing legal status. 
“It's just meant to create chaos,” Martinez said. 
“There's still a lot of fear of people coming to court from what happened last summer.” 
RELATED : As Supreme Court expands Trump's immigration power, experts warn of steeper U.S. population decline 
In the summer of 2025, ICE began arresting people in the hallways outside the Seattle courtroom after their immigration hearings. 
The new approach was part of President Donald Trump’s efforts to increase deportations across the U.S. 
After public outcry and protests inside and outside the courtroom, there’s only been one ICE courtroom arrest this year. 
But the fear still lingers for many, Martinez said, and if they stay home there’s a cost  when people don’t show up on their court dates they’re given in absentia deportation orders. 
It’s a common way immigrants lose their bids to stay in the U.S., and the orders are difficult to fight legally. 
One judge saw 106 child cases on Tuesday. 
More than 30 kids didn’t show and were ordered to be deported. 
“Certainly the most ever,” judge Scala said. 
In the coming days, weeks, and months, more of these orders are expected. 
On Wednesday, attorneys report documenting 99 cases  30 of those were ordered deported for not showing up. 
“The system is not a child-friendly system,” said Hillary Larsen, managing attorney with Kids in Need of Defense or KIND. 
RELATED : Report: ICE wasted millions, endangered detainees in largest immigration facility 
Larsen said the chances of a child achieving permanent status in the U.S. without an attorney present are low to none. 
At least one youth case before judge Scala had been pushed back multiple years because the youth hadn't submitted the proper paperwork. 
That youth had no attorney and no adult present with them. 
“It's virtually impossible to go through the system having the child represent themself,” Larsen said. 
During Tuesday’s hearing, judge Scala linked some children’s immigration cases with their parents if they were present, where the federal government will move forward with their deportation proceedings together. 
Judge Scala also gave pointers to the children, and their guardians and parents if they had one present about how to file paperwork and where to find an immigration attorney. 
They were all given three to six weeks to do so. 
“That's a very short period of time,” Larsen said. 
She said the accelerated and condensed process puts undocumented minors in a precarious position with inadequate support. 
“Having mega masters where there are a lot of children, many that are unrepresented, and then expecting them to have counsel in a matter of weeks for a second hearing is nearly impossible,” Larsen said. 
Why you can trust KUOW 
Gustavo Sagrero Álvarez 
Race, Identity, and Immigration Reporter 
Gustavo covers the intersection of race and identity for KUOW, writing stories that center voices often not catered to in typical news. 
He's most interested in covering how communities effect the levers of power they hold, to effect change. 
More stories from Gustavo Sagrero Álvarez >> 
'We see we're not alone.' 
Seattle's Mexican community celebrates World Cup amid a turbulent time 
Seattle labor groups prepare for increased ICE presence at the World Cup 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.4%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias8.4%This article: 1.3%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias1.3%This article: 4.5%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.5%This article: 5.8%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 1.9%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.9%This article: 1.8%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 16.6%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect16.6%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias12.6%This article: 22.7%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias22.7%This article: 1.7%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.0%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority3.0%This article: 6.6%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma6.6%This article: 0.8%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.8%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 3.8%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring3.8%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.1%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion2.1%This article: 2.5%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 5.0%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.1%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal2.1%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.8%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote13.8%This article: 9.2%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection9.2%This article: 8.2%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice8.2%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.2%

1026 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers34%attributed speech675writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageKUOW • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTheresa Scala • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageExecutive Office of Immigration Review • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coveragePilar Martinez • 8 words • 100.0% coveragePilar Martinez • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coveragePilar Martinez • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTheresa Scala • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageHillary Larsen • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Larsen • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Larsen • 15 words • 100.0% coverageTheresa Scala • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTheresa Scala • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Larsen • 9 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Larsen • 17 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Larsen • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageGustavo Sagrero Álvarez • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKUOW • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Department of Justice

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words7.4% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Department of Justice: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.4 ptsWriter: 12.4%Department of Justice: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-11.1 ptsWriter: 11.1%Department of Justice: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Department of Justice: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.