Speaker summary
⁠41%3 analyzed articles/videos178.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Sutton results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 384.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 178.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,022 of 28,364 speakers). This Evan Sutton is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Evan Sutton
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 178.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.9% percentile
16.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos178.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.5%39.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos