Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eva De Jesus results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 27.17 hits. Analysis detected 160.17 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,899 of 28,364 speakers). This Eva De Jesus is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Eva De Jesus
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.8% percentile
18.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.8%22.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos