Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helena Najar results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 121 hits . Analysis detected 741 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,245 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,905 of 6,628 authors). This Helena Najar is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Helena Najar
Author details
Total words: 1,245
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Personal Incredulity: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst