Speaker summary
51% 17 analyzed articles/videos 1,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These European Commission results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 531 hits . Analysis detected 2,975.857 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,168 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,365 of 28,364 speakers). This European Commission is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. European Commission
Speaker details
Total words: 1,168
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.5% percentile 5.7% BS Score17 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 23.2% 23.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst