Speaker summary
73% 3 analyzed articles/videos 232.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Jaye results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50.5% saturation with 157.35 hits . Analysis detected 833.384 faulty-reasoning hits from 232.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,899 of 28,364 speakers). This Eric Jaye is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Eric Jaye
Speaker details
Total words: 232.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 13.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos232.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 50.5% 50.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 20.5% 20.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 22.9% 22.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 23.8% 23.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Halo Effect: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst