Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Hobsbawm results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Halo Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 84% saturation with 59.25 hits. Analysis detected 104.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,881 of 28,364 speakers). This Eric Hobsbawm is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Eric Hobsbawm
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
33.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 84.0%84.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 84.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos