Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Castillo results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 221 faulty-reasoning hits from 225 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,189 of 27,710 speakers). This Eric Castillo is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Eric Castillo
Speaker details
Total words: 225
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.3% percentile
12.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos225 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.3%17.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos