Speaker summary
⁠54%4 analyzed articles/videos126.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Defense Fund results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.7% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 247.066 faulty-reasoning hits from 126.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,251 of 28,364 speakers). This Environmental Defense Fund is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Environmental Defense Fund
Speaker details
Total words: 126.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
20.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos126.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 55.8%55.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.7%13.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 55.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos