Speaker summary
⁠63%2 analyzed articles/videos78.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Little-Pengelly results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Indoctrination, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 203 faulty-reasoning hits from 78.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 45.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,829 of 28,364 speakers). This Emma Little-Pengelly is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Emma Little-Pengelly
Speaker details
Total words: 78.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
45.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos78.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.4%25.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos