Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Renkey results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Recency Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 48.099 hits. Analysis detected 133.2 faulty-reasoning hits from 131 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,505 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Renkey is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Emily Renkey
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 131
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
19.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos131 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.6%21.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos