Speaker summary
⁠59%2 analyzed articles/videos43.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elsa Thora results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Emotion, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 53.7% saturation with 28.18 hits. Analysis detected 197.18 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,633 of 27,560 speakers). This Elsa Thora is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Elsa Thora
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 43.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
35.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos43.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 80.8%80.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 53.7%53.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.2%34.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 34.2%34.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 26.6%26.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 80.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 53.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos