Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video270.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eloise Skinner results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 588.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 270.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,464 of 28,364 speakers). This Eloise Skinner is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Eloise Skinner
Speaker details
Total words: 270.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.2% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos270.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.4%9.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos