Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eleanor Mueller results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 59.625 hits. Analysis detected 170.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,880 of 28,364 speakers). This Eleanor Mueller is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Eleanor Mueller
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠62%Eleanor Mueller (selected)45%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.6% percentile
44.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.4%27.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos