Does Anyone Know Where the Housing Bill Is? This GOP Leader Doesn’t. 40%

By Malcolm Ferguson68%

6/25/2026, 9:45:15 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.6% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 1,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 365 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.1% and a BS Rank of 40% (12,824 of 21,203 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the article peer group.

Earlier this week, the Senate and then the House passed the biggest housing bill in decades by veto-proof margins, and it was set to be signed by President Trump on Wednesday before he abruptly cancelled the ceremony and demanded Congress first pass his voter-suppressing SAVE America Act. 
But where, literally, is the bill right now? 
There seems to be some confusion about that—and it has major implications for the bill’s fate. 
Michigan Congresswoman Lisa McClain, who chairs the House Republican Conference, said Thursday the bill was on Trump’s desk. 
If so, that means he has 10 days to sign or uselessly veto it, and if he does neither it could either automatically become law or die by the “pocket veto,” depending on whether Congress is in session on day 10. 
(I know, it’s confusing.) 
“It’s been sent to the president’s desk, [and] it’ll pass in ten days if he doesn’t sign it, is that your understanding?” 
Leah Vredenbregt of Gray Media asked McClain. 
“Yep,” she replied. 
But multiple outlets report that the House has not, in fact, sent the bill to Trump. 
“House GOP leaders *still* have not sent the housing bill to the White House, I’m told—so the 10-day clock still has not started,” Semafor’s Eleanor Mueller wrote Thursday morning. 
“Trump and [House Speaker Mike] Johnson are expected to discuss when to send the bill—and start the clock—at their meeting this afternoon, I’m told.” 
The same remained true hours later. 
“This is not correct,” Punchbowl News’s Jake Sherman wrote in reference to McClain’s comments. 
“The House Republican leadership has not sent the president this bill yet. 
It is not ‘on his desk.’” 
This confusion is as strange as it sounds. 
Why would McClain claim that it’s on the president’s desk if it isn’t? 
And if it’s not on his desk, which means the ten-day countdown has not begun, then when is Johnson planning to send it to him? 
Is he waiting to do so until he knows Congress will be in session on that tenth day, rather than on July 4th recess? 
Someone must have the answers, but McClain certainly does not. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 5.6%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias2.2%This article: 8.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 3.3%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic8.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 33.7%Malcolm Ferguson: 11.7%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect33.7%This article: 11.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion11.2%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 46.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 17.7%newrepublic.com: 13.0%Negativity Bias46.6%This article: 6.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias6.6%This article: 10.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error10.1%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.2%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 5.2%newrepublic.com: 3.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 1.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man1.1%This article: 18.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 3.1%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority18.4%This article: 18.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.6%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma18.1%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 11.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning11.2%This article: 2.7%Malcolm Ferguson: 6.7%newrepublic.com: 7.9%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Bandwagon5.5%This article: 12.9%Malcolm Ferguson: 8.9%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion12.9%This article: 5.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question5.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.4%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 5.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Personal Incredulity5.5%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 12.9%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy12.9%This article: 19.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote19.5%This article: 1.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.1%This article: 20.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 16.7%newrepublic.com: 15.2%Biased Writer Voice20.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 10.3%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

365 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers37%attributed speech230writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLisa McClain • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageLeah Vredenbregt of Gray Media • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLeah Vredenbregt of Gray Media • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLisa McClain • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageEleanor Mueller • 29 words • 100.0% coverageEleanor Mueller • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJake Sherman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJake Sherman • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJake Sherman • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eleanor Mueller

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words39% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Eleanor Mueller: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-31.7 ptsWriter: 31.7%Eleanor Mueller: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -20.4 ptsWriter: 20.4%Eleanor Mueller: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Eleanor Mueller: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.