Keyword summary
33%2 analyzed articles/videos365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Mcclain results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 3,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,310 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (26,572 of 35,662 keywords). This Lisa Mcclain is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Lisa Mcclain
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
26%Lisa Mcclain (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,310
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos