Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These El Pais results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,686 of 28,364 speakers). This El Pais is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
El Pais
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos