Futurism88%

El Niño Already Killing Thousands in Europe 90%

By Joe Wilkins84%

7/5/2026, 12:02:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 72.3% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 282 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.4% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,232 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the article peer group.

We're officially in an El Niño year, and as predicted, it's a scorcher. 
Record temperatures are already being recorded around the world, from the streets of New York to the icy shelves of the Antarctic. 
Even the surface waters of the world's waterways are under unprecedented stress from the heat, with the average global ocean temperature breaking the all-time record high for the month of June. 
The human impact, as predicted, is already staggering. 
While the heat waves currently baking North America, South Asia, South America and Africa are sure to have their fair share of tragedy, early reporting on weather-related fatalities across Europe makes it clear that these are no ordinary summer conditions. 
According to El Pais, June heat has culminated in over 1,000 excess deaths in Spain, 623 of which came as a direct result of Europe's June heatwave. 
In France, where temperatures are eclipsing worst-case forecasts set for the year 2050, a further 1,000 or more deaths have been attributed to extreme heat. 
Both tragedies are a terrifying sign of things to come, as the current El Niño phase, a warm period of a 2-7 year climate cycle, is literally just beginning. 
In 2022, the most recent banner year for European heat waves, there were over 61,000 heat-related deaths across the continent  and it wasn't even an El Niño year. 
Given El Niño's amplifying affect on European heat, to say nothing of its impact on the rest of the world, it's likely that number could be a whole lot worse by the time the Autumnal equinox comes around. 
More on extreme heat: All But Five US States Are Currently Experiencing Droughts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.4%Joe Wilkins: 6.8%Futurism: 6.1%Confirmation Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.7%Futurism: 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 36.9%Joe Wilkins: 6.5%Futurism: 6.2%Availability Heuristic36.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.3%Futurism: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 33.3%Joe Wilkins: 3.9%Futurism: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias33.3%This article: 2.5%Joe Wilkins: 13.2%Futurism: 11.3%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.1%Futurism: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.7%Futurism: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 18.1%Joe Wilkins: 1.9%Futurism: 2.2%Optimism Bias18.1%This article: 40.4%Joe Wilkins: 4.7%Futurism: 4.4%Pessimism Bias40.4%This article: 72.3%Joe Wilkins: 25.8%Futurism: 22.5%Negativity Bias72.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.2%Futurism: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.5%Futurism: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.3%Futurism: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.6%Futurism: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 20.6%Joe Wilkins: 2.3%Futurism: 2.1%Recency Bias20.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.0%Futurism: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.4%Joe Wilkins: 5.8%Futurism: 6.8%Appeal to Authority18.4%This article: 14.2%Joe Wilkins: 2.6%Futurism: 2.6%False Dilemma14.2%This article: 23.8%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 2.5%Slippery Slope23.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.3%Futurism: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 27.0%Joe Wilkins: 12.7%Futurism: 10.5%Hasty Generalization27.0%This article: 4.6%Joe Wilkins: 1.1%Futurism: 1.0%Red Herring4.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 45.4%Joe Wilkins: 11.5%Futurism: 9.5%Appeal to Emotion45.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.7%Futurism: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 23.8%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 18.8%Joe Wilkins: 1.3%Futurism: 1.1%Burden of Proof18.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.8%Joe Wilkins: 4.3%Futurism: 4.4%Anecdotal7.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.0%Futurism: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 34.0%Joe Wilkins: 2.3%Futurism: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)34.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.0%Futurism: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.4%Futurism: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.6%Futurism: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 24.5%Joe Wilkins: 3.4%Futurism: 3.9%Unattributed Quote24.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 36.2%Joe Wilkins: 26.8%Futurism: 20.7%Biased Writer Voice36.2%This article: 10.3%Joe Wilkins: 1.8%Futurism: 2.1%Indoctrination10.3%This article: 11.0%Joe Wilkins: 5.0%Futurism: 2.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.4%Futurism: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.6%

282 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker9.6%attributed speech255writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageEl Pais • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

El Pais

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+83.5 ptsWriter: 16.5%El Pais: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-40.0 ptsWriter: 40.0%El Pais: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-12.2 ptsWriter: 12.2%El Pais: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-11.4 ptsWriter: 11.4%El Pais: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%El Pais: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.