Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward850 results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 55 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,504 of 28,364 speakers). This Edward850 is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Edward850
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 55
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos55 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos