Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward Burr results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Overconfidence Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 74.7% saturation with 82.875 hits. Analysis detected 217.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,087 of 28,364 speakers). This Edward Burr is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Edward Burr
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
39.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 74.7%74.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 74.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos