Speaker summary
⁠71%3 analyzed articles/videos69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Policy Institute results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 80.6% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 208 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 78.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,217 of 28,364 speakers). This Economic Policy Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Economic Policy Institute
Speaker details
Total words: 69.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.6% percentile
78.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos69.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 80.6%80.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 54.3%54.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 80.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 54.3%, sitewide 2.0%Recency BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos