Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DR results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,735 of 28,364 speakers). This DR is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
DR
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos