Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DPSCD Foundation results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 42.75 hits. Analysis detected 156.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (9,471 of 37,728 speakers). This DPSCD Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
DPSCD Foundation
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠75%DPSCD Foundation (selected)57%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos