Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video67 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dorota Dzierzbicka results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Status Quo Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 76.1% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 118 faulty-reasoning hits from 67 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,182 of 28,364 speakers). This Dorota Dzierzbicka is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Dorota Dzierzbicka
Speaker details
Total words: 67
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
58.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos67 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 76.1%76.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 76.1%76.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 76.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 76.1%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos